Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unary operator on -9223372036854775808 does not invert #23036

Closed
Le0Developer opened this issue Dec 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

unary operator on -9223372036854775808 does not invert #23036

Le0Developer opened this issue Dec 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Bug This tag is applied to issues which reports bugs.

Comments

@Le0Developer
Copy link
Member

Le0Developer commented Dec 1, 2024

V doctor:

V full version: V 0.4.8 602b097.94ce64c
OS: macos, macOS, 15.1.1, 24B2091
Processor: 10 cpus, 64bit, little endian, Apple M4

getwd: /Users/leodev/p/v/fast2
vexe: /Users/leodev/p/v/v/v
vexe mtime: 2024-12-01 10:31:00

vroot: OK, value: /Users/leodev/p/v/v
VMODULES: OK, value: /Users/leodev/.vmodules
VTMP: OK, value: /tmp/v_501

Git version: git version 2.47.0
Git vroot status: weekly.2024.48-35-g94ce64c6 (2 commit(s) behind V master)
.git/config present: true

CC version: Apple clang version 16.0.0 (clang-1600.0.26.4)
emcc version: N/A
thirdparty/tcc status: thirdparty-macos-arm64 713692d4

What did you do?
./v -g -o vdbg cmd/v && ./vdbg repro.v

fn main() {
    x := i64(-9223372036854775808)
    dump(x)
    dump(-x)
}

What did you expect to see?

2nd number should be positive

What did you see instead?

[repro.v:3] x: -9223372036854775808
[repro.v:4] -x: -9223372036854775808

Note

You can use the 👍 reaction to increase the issue's priority for developers.

Please note that only the 👍 reaction to the issue itself counts as a vote.
Other reactions and those to comments will not be taken into account.

Huly®: V_0.6-21476

@Le0Developer Le0Developer added the Bug This tag is applied to issues which reports bugs. label Dec 1, 2024
@Delta456
Copy link
Member

Delta456 commented Dec 1, 2024

I am not sure if this is an issue because Go also outputs the same

Playground Link: https://go.dev/play/p/J5OPWGybdCF

@Le0Developer
Copy link
Member Author

I only just realized this is Int64 max + 1. So there indeed is no real solution for this, but its still very unintuitive.

I stumbled upon this because somehow this value made it into a time.Duration and the time.Duration.str() output --808ns (note the double -)

@Le0Developer Le0Developer closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug This tag is applied to issues which reports bugs.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants