-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
drawing a 3d path confuses axis ticks in a later (2d) figure #514
Comments
Yes, this appears to be a bug. In the meantime remove |
Thanks, I've just now tried it. Without The second is larger: The 3d figure (the dashed unitcircle3) is rendered as a raster image in the PDF file, rather than as a vector graphic. I couldn't find a switch to force vector graphics, other than |
Possible workaround (not tested): Rather than calling |
|
P.S. If you insist on using the experimental |
Thank you -- I've just tested it, and it works. |
I tried
But it may be an issue with talking to my window manager (X11+fvwm3). It's probably not the most modern of setups (since forever, I had used twm). |
Indeed, that workaround did work. I like Of course, if PDF had a universal and decent 3d format (universal in the sense of being supported on almost all viewers including on Linux), I would happily use it too where needed pedagogically. But it seems like such a format change to PDF will never happen. |
With the following code, the graph in the second pdf figure has a extra set of axis ticks next to the left end. These ticks are closely spaced (and not what was intended). But changing the
unitcircle3
tounitcircle
solves the problem. The code is compiled withasy -noprc -render=0 -tex pdflatex -f pdf -V -wait "three-graph-bug"
using Asymptote 2.95 (on Debian linux). I think that this behavior is a bug (maybe a name clash between something in thethree
module and thegraph
module?), but I am happy to be corrected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: