From 2cdfcdcf32d33e306248e300bfef10005cd498a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jurgen J. Vinju" Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:07:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] added some initial tests for syntax modifiers --- .../functionality/SyntaxRoleModifiers1.rsc | 73 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/org/rascalmpl/library/lang/rascal/tests/functionality/SyntaxRoleModifiers1.rsc diff --git a/src/org/rascalmpl/library/lang/rascal/tests/functionality/SyntaxRoleModifiers1.rsc b/src/org/rascalmpl/library/lang/rascal/tests/functionality/SyntaxRoleModifiers1.rsc new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe54ca61386 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/org/rascalmpl/library/lang/rascal/tests/functionality/SyntaxRoleModifiers1.rsc @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +module lang::rascal::tests::functionality::SyntaxRoleModifiers1 + +import Type; + +lexical Z = [a-z]+; + +syntax A = "a" | "b" "b"; + +layout L = [\ ]*; + +data A = a(); + +test bool useOfDifferentModifierTypesWithinASingleScope() { + data[A] anExample = a(); + syntax[A] anotherExample = [syntax[A]] "a"; + return anExample != anotherExample + && anotherExample := (A) `a`; +} + +test bool dispatchingOnSyntaxRole() { + int f(lexical[&T] _) = 1; + int f(syntax[&T] _) = 2; + default int f(data[&T] _) = 4; + + return f(a()) == 4 + && f([lexical[Z]] "z") == 1 + && f([syntax[A]] "a") == 2; +} + +test bool canNestSyntaxModifiers() { + data[data[A]] v1 = a(); + data[syntax[A]] v2 = a(); + data[lexical[A]] v3 = a(); + data[layout[A]] v4 = a(); + syntax[syntax[A]] v5 = [syntax[A]] "a"; + syntax[data[A]] v6 = [syntax[A]] "a"; + syntax[keyword[A]] v7 = [syntax[A]] "a"; + syntax[layout[A]] v8 = [syntax[A]] "a"; + syntax[lexical[A]] v9 = [syntax[A]] "a"; + + // nothing crashed so far and the values remain equal: + return {a()} == {v1,v2,v3,v4} + && {[syntax[A]] "a"} == {v5,v6,v7,v8,v9}; +} + +test bool namePreservation1() { + // this is a simple ad-hoc mock for the real implode function: + data[&T] implode(syntax[&T] t:appl(prod(sort("A"),_,_),_)) = a(); + + // the type signature of `implode` guarantees name preservation, + // so implode of a syntax A will produce a data A without a type-checking error: + data[A] x = implode([syntax[A]] "a"); + + // this is not the real test. Of course the dynamic type would be data[A]. + // the real test was the above assignment, where the static type system for + // assignment and function return types would fail if we had a bug here. + return adt("A",[]) == typeOf(x); +} + +test bool namePreservation2() { + // this is a simple ad-hoc mock for the real explode function: + syntax[&T] explode(data[&T] t:a()) = [syntax[A]] "a"; + + // the type signature of `implode` guarantees name preservation, + // so explode of a data A will produce a syntax A without a type-checking error: + syntax[A] x = explode(a()); + + // this is not the real test. Of course the dynamic type would be data[A]. + // the real test was the above assignment, where the static type system for + // assignment and function return types would fail if we had a bug here. + return sort("A") == typeOf(x); +} + \ No newline at end of file