Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotations in the crowdsourcing interface cannot overlap #31

Closed
oplatek opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #177
Closed

Annotations in the crowdsourcing interface cannot overlap #31

oplatek opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #177
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed high priority Tasks which should be finished ASAP

Comments

@oplatek
Copy link
Member

oplatek commented Jun 23, 2024

The current implementation supports only mutually exclusive annotations.

However, for annotation set containing labels:

  • Incorrect
  • Interesting

One needs to annotate spans of text that quite often overlap.

@oplatek oplatek added bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed high priority Tasks which should be finished ASAP labels Jun 23, 2024
@kasnerz
Copy link
Collaborator

kasnerz commented Jul 15, 2024

In case someone wants to delve into this, here is the JS library used for the annotation process: https://github.com/SuLab/YPet .

@oplatek oplatek removed the bug Something isn't working label Aug 29, 2024
@kasnerz
Copy link
Collaborator

kasnerz commented Sep 10, 2024

We agree with @oplatek that we will not support overlapping annotations. It is a good practice to keep the labels independent of each other and not supporting it will allow us to keep the library conceptually simple.

We will describe our design choice in the documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed high priority Tasks which should be finished ASAP
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants