You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We rely mostly on the DVL to return good pings in order to obtain a state estimation. This can result signifcant state drifts if the pings are not good... So a potential solution is to dynamically set coefficents in the kalman filter to vary the trust.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kev-the-dev
changed the title
Look into the state estimation kalman filter
Improve state esimation (particularly during DVL beam failures)
Jan 22, 2019
From reading the KF code and speaking with Forest, it DOES seem DVL beam loses are handled correctly.
kev-the-dev
changed the title
Improve state esimation (particularly during DVL beam failures)
Improve state estimation (particularly during DVL beam failures)
Feb 22, 2019
We rely mostly on the DVL to return good pings in order to obtain a state estimation. This can result signifcant state drifts if the pings are not good... So a potential solution is to dynamically set coefficents in the kalman filter to vary the trust.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: