You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue tracks the problem (my thoughts, other folk's thoughts) related to making it easy (on-click) :
[Suggested by @conormurray95] For ease of use for other developers it would be more convenient if the binary was available via something like homebrew that could be installed with one command and used via the cli. The reason I have it as a dockerfile right now is so our make flag-cleanup command can be run locally by any dev without any setup because it:
Pulls the docker image with Piranha tool installed
Mounts our codebase as a volume inside the image
Runs the piranha binary against the codebase using whatever flag they input
If folks are ok installing rust up tool chain its actually straightforward. Just cargo install --git https://github.com/uber/piranha.git This will install the polyglot piranha exectuable from the github project This is undocumented. But kinda intuitive for folks familiar with cargo, I will document this.
It would be specially nice if we can make a release on crates.io itself. But we have blockers. Crates.io does not accept un verified dependencies. While we have certain modifications to the upstream tree-sitter-grammar repos that we maintain in a branch and are currently under code review . We are waiting for them to accept our changes and make a release.
Some how figure out how to make the perfect pypi release
I think we should do 1, 3 and 4(as much as possible). I would love to do (2) too if we reach a point that we have so many users like ripgrep :)
This issue tracks the problem (my thoughts, other folk's thoughts) related to making it easy (on-click) :
cargo install --git https://github.com/uber/piranha.git
This will install the polyglot piranha exectuable from the github project This is undocumented. But kinda intuitive for folks familiar with cargo, I will document this.I think we should do 1, 3 and 4(as much as possible). I would love to do (2) too if we reach a point that we have so many users like ripgrep :)
cc @lazaroclapp
Reference conversations :
#358 (comment)
#311 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: