We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Follow up from #448
This could be used for ignoring corrupt records irrespective of the readLength check.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this needed ? It's another magic number which we will need to default very high. Which might defeat the purpose
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, Ruban Monu [email protected] wrote:
Follow up from #448 #448 This could be used for ignoring corrupt records irrespective of the readLength check. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #449.
Follow up from #448 #448
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #449.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Follow up from #448
This could be used for ignoring corrupt records irrespective of the readLength check.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: