From 67a2d7b6facfff35780fac6629c893c8512eb7bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bennibolm Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:48:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix typos --- docs/literate/src/files/subcell_shock_capturing.jl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/literate/src/files/subcell_shock_capturing.jl b/docs/literate/src/files/subcell_shock_capturing.jl index c1418894f64..512e278f66b 100644 --- a/docs/literate/src/files/subcell_shock_capturing.jl +++ b/docs/literate/src/files/subcell_shock_capturing.jl @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ surface_flux = flux_lax_friedrichs volume_flux = flux_ranocha basis = LobattoLegendreBasis(3) -# The actuall limiter is implemented within [`SubcellLimiterIDP`](@ref). It always requires the +# The actual limiter is implemented within [`SubcellLimiterIDP`](@ref). It always requires the # parameters `equations` and `basis`. With additional parameters (described [above](@ref SubcellLimiterIDP) # or listed in the docstring) you can specify and enabled the wanted limiting options. # Here, the simulation should contain local limiting for the density using lower and upper bounds. @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ plot(sol) # On the one hand, the deviations could be in machine precision which is not problematic. # On the other hand, the target bound can be exceeded by larger deviations. Mostly, this is due # to too large time step sizes and can be easily fixed by reducing the CFL number. -# Rarely, the larger deviations come from the use of specifc boundary condition of source terms. +# Rarely, the larger deviations come from the use of specific boundary condition of source terms. #- # In all this cases the exceeded bounds are not too problematic. Though, it is reasonable to # monitor them. Because of that Trixi.jl supports a bounds checking routine implemented using