New classification of packages on trilinos.github.io is incorrect

[bartlettroscoe]

CC: @maherou, @jwillenbring, @rppawlo

I just noticed that the "Packages" drop-down at the top of:

• https://trilinos.github.io/

Now shows them partitioned into several different categories:

• MPI+X Packages
• MPI-Only Packages
• Research Packages
• Archive Packages

I am not sure who came up with the selection of packages in those lists but they are not consistent. Here are some examples of consistencies:

• Panzer is listed under "MPI+X Packages" build Phalanx is listed under "Research Packages". But Panzer has a required dependence on Phalanx so would Panzer not need to be listed as a "Research" package?
• Belos and Anasazi are listed under "MPI+X Packages" but Thyra, Stratimikos, NOX, LOCA, etc. are listed under "MPI-Only Packages". That makes zero sense. These are all just Abstract Numerical Algorithms (ANAs) that case use any underlying threaded or accelerated implementation. If Thyra is listed under "MPI-Only Packages" then Belos and Anasazi should be as well.
• ROL is listed under "MPI+X Packages" yet still can't fully run on a GPU. If Thyra is listed as "MPI-Only" then so should ROL.
• RTOp (not RTOP) is listed under "Archive Packages" but Thyra has a required dependence on RTOp so it can't be consider an archive package if Thyra is not considered an Archive package. Yet "TriUtils" is not listed under "Archive Packages". That is not consistent.
• Why is ForTrilinos even listed? It is not even in Trilinos. And how is that not a research package?

[maherou]

Closing. Content is repeated from #33