-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 570
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Panzer: Write a sideset field to an Exodus file #13612
Comments
If the boundary is defined as a sideset (Or, you define a sideset to match your boundary), then you can output transient variables on a sideset in the same way that you would output them on an element block... Note that this is at the exodus API level, so I'm not sure how that has been hooked up at the higher-level application level. |
Greg,
Thanks for your email. When I look at the documentation
<https://docs.trilinos.org/dev/packages/panzer/doc/html/classpanzer__stk_1_1STK__Interface.html>,
I see three functions of interest:
- addEdgeField: to output variables on a sideset in 2D.
- addFaceField to output variables on a sideset in 3D.
- addCellField: we already use that function to write cell fields to the
output file.
What is a bit confusing to me, is that `addEdgeField` and `addFaceField`
take a `block_id` as an input argument. I tried to pass a sideset name to
these functions but got an invalid block id error message at runtime. I
looked at other functions available in the same class but none of them seem
to be of use for what I want to do.
Thanks,
Marco
…On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 5:46 PM Greg Sjaardema ***@***.***> wrote:
If the boundary is defined as a sideset (Or, you define a sideset to match
your boundary), then you can output transient variables on a sideset in the
same way that you would output them on an element block...
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13612 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD4GCW5PBVCZHDSTH2AE4T2BJU57AVCNFSM6AAAAABR6BLTVWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBUGI4TEMBWGY>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Marc-Olivier Delchini
|
@delcmo - there currently is no support through the panzer interfaces for adding sideset values to an exodus mesh. We wrap a stk mesh object and write all data directly into stk. The stk_io package pushes the data to SEACAS/IOSS which uses SEACAS/Exodus to write the exodus format. The exodus mesh supports it as Greg noted, but It's not clear if all of the underlying IO layers STK->STK_IO->IOSS->Exodus support that. It probably does, but we have never had a request for that. @alanw0 - can we store sideset tensor data directly in stk and have it automatically write to exodus? |
@rppawlo yes that is supported. |
Thanks Roger and Alan for the quick response. I will give it a try and get
back to you if I have any questions.
Marco
…On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:11 AM Alan Williams ***@***.***> wrote:
@rppawlo <https://github.com/rppawlo> yes that is supported.
To see an example, take a look at
packages/stk/stk_doc_tests/stk_io/howToCreateAndWriteNodesetOrSideset.cpp.
The sideset test starts around line 220 and shows how to create the field
on a sideset part.
Writing out the mesh is done down in the function
'verify_sidesetField_in_file', which ends up calling
stk::io::write_mesh_with_fields a couple layers down.
Now that I look at it, this "doc test" is kind of convoluted. We'll try to
clean that up and make it easier to follow. But it works. :-)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13612 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD4GCQXI5Z2RLUR4L3QVBD2BM2JJAVCNFSM6AAAAABR6BLTVWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBVGY3TOMZZGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Marc-Olivier Delchini
|
Thanks @alanw0 ! |
Hello,
We compute fields like the shear stress that are only defined at the boundaries since it requires the normals. Is there a way to write that field to the Exodus file?
Marco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: