Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix ipynb style and update UI packages #7141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2023
Merged

Fix ipynb style and update UI packages #7141

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2023

Conversation

nopcoder
Copy link
Contributor

  • Update UI packages (ipynb included)
  • Use ipynb css included from the package

Close #7122

@nopcoder nopcoder added bug Something isn't working area/UI Improvements or additions to UI labels Dec 10, 2023
@nopcoder nopcoder requested a review from a team December 10, 2023 12:19
@nopcoder nopcoder self-assigned this Dec 10, 2023
@nopcoder nopcoder added the include-changelog PR description should be included in next release changelog label Dec 10, 2023
eladlachmi
eladlachmi approved these changes Dec 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@eladlachmi eladlachmi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nopcoder nopcoder merged commit a638bd7 into master Dec 10, 2023
38 of 41 checks passed
@nopcoder nopcoder deleted the chore/webui-updates branch December 10, 2023 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eladlachmi eladlachmi eladlachmi approved these changes

Assignees

@nopcoder nopcoder

Labels
area/UI Improvements or additions to UI bug Something isn't working include-changelog PR description should be included in next release changelog
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The color representation in the UI notebook preview isn't quite consistent with the expected outcome
2 participants
@nopcoder @eladlachmi