You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
where A_c is the vcmax limited photosynthetic rate, A_j is the light-limited photosynthetic rate, h is a curvature factor and R_d is the leaf-level respiration. $A_c$ and $A_j$ are functions of internal $c_i$, which is found through a root-solving problem based on the following equation.
$$
A_n(c_i) = g_c(c_a - c_i).~(2)
$$
However, finding that root-solving breaks when A_j is extremely low on account of practically zero light availability, because R_d, which is a fixed value, causes A_n to become negative ranging from the compensation point ($c_i$ ~ 4Pa) to $C_a$ (40Pa), meaning that there is no valid solution, because right side of equation 2 = 0 at $c_i$ = 40.
This is shown in the below figure.
Wondering how to solve this problem. Should the ci be found via root-solving, and then R_d is removed? This would cause the solved $c_i$ to be slightly more negative emerging from upward translation of the $A_n$ curve.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporting an issue which was not apparent in the recent manuscript but will occur in stand simulations.
Net assimilation in the leaf submodel is currently implemented as:
where A_c is the vcmax limited photosynthetic rate, A_j is the light-limited photosynthetic rate, h is a curvature factor and R_d is the leaf-level respiration.$A_c$ and $A_j$ are functions of internal $c_i$ , which is found through a root-solving problem based on the following equation.
However, finding that root-solving breaks when A_j is extremely low on account of practically zero light availability, because R_d, which is a fixed value, causes A_n to become negative ranging from the compensation point ($c_i$ ~ 4Pa) to $C_a$ (40Pa), meaning that there is no valid solution, because right side of equation 2 = 0 at $c_i$ = 40.
This is shown in the below figure.
Wondering how to solve this problem. Should the ci be found via root-solving, and then R_d is removed? This would cause the solved$c_i$ to be slightly more negative emerging from upward translation of the $A_n$ curve.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: