You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. Thanks for your query. There are actually two different data points. One is Colwall CSO and one is Colwall STW.
You can see this more clearly if you zoom in. You can use the +/- buttons, or double click/double tap, or use two fingers to move and scale the map (mobile)
Hope that's useful. We take data quite seriously so always happy to look into any inconsistencies.
Thank you for explaining it. I will share both sets of data now via the village social media page and point out why the numbers are different. There is a currently a debate about further building of a new housing estate and its impact on sewerage. Your data has helped clarify the situation in respect of Severn Trent. This was just the data we needed.Kind regardsMhariSent from my iPadOn 21 May 2023, at 16:46, Top Poop ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi. Thanks for your query. There are actually two different data points. One is Colwall CSO and one is Colwall STW.
You can see this more clearly if you zoom in. You can use the +/- buttons, or double click/double tap, or use two fingers to move and scale the map (mobile)
Hope that's useful. We take data quite seriously so always happy to look into any inconsistencies.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
:
COLWALL SO
Cradley Brook
79 Dumps / 579 hours by Severn Trent Water
Vs
Severn Trent Water
Cradley Brook
Colwall STW
103 sewage dumps 1360 hours 84.5 % reporting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: