You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are you combining the coverage and the unique crashes of both phases, or is the total coverage and the number of unique crashes derived from the gibb sampling phase?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yes, in the Stoat's paper, we combine the coverage and the unique crashes of both phases as the indicator of the overal tool effectiveness. But in the tool implementation, we separate the coverage and the found crashes into different folders during the model construction and the gibb sampling phase.
Are you combining the coverage and the unique crashes of both phases, or is the total coverage and the number of unique crashes derived from the gibb sampling phase?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: