Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update terraform-module #597

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github.com/terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-powervs-instance module minor v0.2.6 -> v0.3.0
terraform-ibm-modules/landing-zone/ibm (source) module minor 4.4.6 -> 4.6.0

Release Notes

terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-powervs-instance (github.com/terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-powervs-instance)

v0.3.0

Compare Source

Features

v0.2.8

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v0.2.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-landing-zone (terraform-ibm-modules/landing-zone/ibm)

v4.6.0

Compare Source

Features
  • Add OCP boot volume KMS encryption support (NOTE: Enabled by default for new clusters, but will not be enabled when upgrading from previous version as encryption can only occur at initial provision time) (#​534) (26f0d20)

v4.5.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • update required ibm provider version to >= 1.56.1 (#​545) (39f1a6f)

v4.5.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • scope the source of the secrets_manager_to_cos auth policy to the resource group (#​516) (5e481cc)

v4.5.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update DAs IBM provider version to 1.56.1 (#​543)

v4.5.2

Compare Source

⚠️ This release will currently not deploy in IBM Schematics due to a known provider bug. Please use v4.5.3 which has the fix for this if running in IBM Schematics.
Bug Fixes
⚠️ Warning

If you are upgrading from a previous release, and you are using the override JSON to provision additional VSI data volumes using the block_storage_volumes value, the terraform plan will tell you that it wants to destroy the volumes that are in the Default resource group and recreate them in the same resource group that the VSIs are provisioned in.

If indeed you wish to continue to keep your data volumes in the Default resource group (to prevent them from being destroyed and recreated on upgrade), you can achieve this by adding the Default resource group ID into the block_storage_volumes array in the vsi part of the override JSON. For example:

{
.....
  "vsi": [
    {
        "boot_volume_encryption_key_name": "PREFIX-vsi-volume-key",
        "image_name": "ibm-redhat-8-6-minimal-amd64-5",
        "machine_type": "cx2-8x16",
        "name": "sbx-workload",
        "resource_group": "PREFIX-workload-rg",
        "block_storage_volumes": [
            {
                "name":           "datavol",
                "profile":        "general-purpose",
                "capacity":       100,
                "encryption_key": "PREFIX-vsi-volume-key",
                "resource_group_id" : "65xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxa3fd"
            }
        ]
....
    }
  ]
....
}

v4.5.1

Compare Source

⚠️ This release will currently not deploy in IBM Schematics due to a known provider bug. Please use v4.5.3 which has the fix for this if running in IBM Schematics.
Bug Fixes

v4.5.0

Compare Source

⚠️ This release will currently not deploy in IBM Schematics due to a known provider bug. Please use v4.5.3 which has the fix for this if running in IBM Schematics.
Features
  • added functionality to attach access tags to resources in. (#​447) (f4c3e3a)
    The resources which support access tags are:
    - Cluster
    - COS
    - VPE
    - VPN
    - KMS
    - Secrets Manager
    - Security Groups
    - VSIs (Bastion, F5, standard VSI)

    In order to utilize the access tags for a resource you will need to add a field to the override.json. For example, below is a snippet on how to add access tags to KMS:
{
  "key_management": {
    "access_tags": ["tag-group:tag-name"]
  }
}

NOTE: creating access tags via Terraform is currently not supported. This module only enables tagging resources with already existing access tags. For more information on creating these access tags, see https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/account?topic=account-access-tags-tutorial.

v4.4.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • lock OCP DA version into OCP 4.12 and add validation (#​511) (ae8f462)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

1 similar comment
@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

1 similar comment
@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

1 similar comment
@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

1 similar comment
@terraform-ibm-modules-dev
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@surajsbharadwaj surajsbharadwaj deleted the renovate/terraform-module branch September 6, 2023 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants