Skip to content

Issues: tempoCollaboration/OQuPy

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

tempo_guess_parameter check for alpha=0.0 tidy up Something needs to be tidied up
#139 opened Aug 15, 2024 by piperfw
GibbsTempo non-diagonal coupling operators bug Something isn't working
#132 opened Jun 17, 2024 by gefux
issue and proposed fix for create_deltas enhancement New feature or request
#128 opened Apr 29, 2024 by eoin-dp-oneill
Implement control for TEMPO dynamics computation enhancement New feature or request
#126 opened Apr 1, 2024 by piperfw
Computing smaller process tensors from larger ones enhancement New feature or request
#121 opened Feb 11, 2024 by gefux
SVD Call Fail / Initial State Checks bug Something isn't working testing Test cases are needed
#118 opened Feb 10, 2024 by piperfw
Dissolve util.py tidy up Something needs to be tidied up
#110 opened Jan 27, 2024 by gefux
Redesign defensive code tidy up Something needs to be tidied up
#107 opened Jan 27, 2024 by gefux
Testing of ProcessTensor classes testing Test cases are needed
#103 opened Jan 27, 2024 by gefux
Make ChainControl use Control objects tidy up Something needs to be tidied up
#101 opened Jan 27, 2024 by gefux
Tests for single system controls testing Test cases are needed
#100 opened Jan 27, 2024 by gefux
Move computation of influence matrices for TEMPO and PT-TEMPO to bath.py tidy up Something needs to be tidied up
#99 opened Jan 27, 2024 by gefux
Use a stable SVD function call bug Something isn't working priority Important to get done soon
#65 opened May 6, 2022 by NominHanggai
A question on setting the initial state physics Issues related to the simulation of a particular model question Further information is requested
#63 opened Mar 23, 2022 by adscft-quibt
Make PT-TEMPO save memory by writing results to file during computation enhancement New feature or request someday Maybe something to work on someday
#30 opened Nov 16, 2021 by gefux
The TEMPO and PT-TEMPO backend is hard to read tidy up Something needs to be tidied up
#28 opened Nov 16, 2021 by gefux
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.