Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feedback] [UX] Consider including links to other Telerik docs #59

Open
ikoevska opened this issue Nov 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

[Feedback] [UX] Consider including links to other Telerik docs #59

ikoevska opened this issue Nov 14, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@ikoevska
Copy link
Contributor

A user has made the following comment via the feedback form:

"I trying to look up information on properties/methods of the Telerik user controls (TextInputUpdate property of a DataFormDataField).

It is not documented anywhere (search returns no results), nor is it used in your published examples.

Why don't you provide a proper reference manual, either downloadable or off-line?"

It is worth considering whether we want to have some visible links to docs.telerik.com or to other popular docs locations, e.g., in the footer.

@TsvetinaIvanova
Copy link
Contributor

TsvetinaIvanova commented Nov 16, 2016

This feedback is about WPF, at least the APIs quoted by the customer. We usually add links to the docs in the articles content or See Also section, when there is content relevant to the issue. For example, http://docs.telerik.com/platform/knowledge-base/troubleshooting/cannot-connect-to-database-server-from-a-data-link-server.

@ikoevska
Copy link
Contributor Author

I know what the issue is about. This item is of a more general nature. For example, whether we want to redesign our header/footer to include more comprehensive links to other popular documentation sets. Or if we want to overhaul our search to show "Didn't find what you were looking for, why not try blah blah". It is a matter of UX and design and not so much of including links at the bottom of separate articles.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants