You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Compared to the pseudo-code of Mr Varadi (https://cssanalytics.wordpress.com/2013/11/26/fast-threshold-clustering-algorithm-ftca/), I can read that if the correlation between HC and LC > threshold, while Mr Varadi pseudo-code is Add to Cluster all other assets that have yet been assigned to a Cluster and have an Average Correlation to HC and LC > Threshold, the FTCA code implemented here seems to assign all remaining assets to the HC/LC cluster.
Would you remember why is that ?
Cheers,
Roman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello SIT !
I know this dates back several years, but I would have a question on the FTCA algorithm implementation:
SIT/R/strategy.r
Line 2276 in 6327d4e
Compared to the pseudo-code of Mr Varadi (https://cssanalytics.wordpress.com/2013/11/26/fast-threshold-clustering-algorithm-ftca/), I can read that if the correlation between HC and LC > threshold, while Mr Varadi pseudo-code is Add to Cluster all other assets that have yet been assigned to a Cluster and have an Average Correlation to HC and LC > Threshold, the FTCA code implemented here seems to assign all remaining assets to the HC/LC cluster.
Would you remember why is that ?
Cheers,
Roman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: