Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tokenized search with possible Boolean options. #397

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
lemon1324 opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
1 of 3 tasks

Tokenized search with possible Boolean options. #397

lemon1324 opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
⬆️ enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lemon1324
Copy link

What is the problem you are trying to solve with this feature?

Let's say I have items named:

  • "Item, long description, blue"
  • "Item, long description, red"
  • Items of many other colors.

Let's say I also have several items:

  • "Object, long description, blue"
  • Objects of many other colors.

Then currently, searching "Item" returns items of all colors, while searching "blue" returns items and objects, but searching "Item blue" returns nothing because that is not an exact substring of the inventory entry I'm looking for.

What is the solution you are proposing?

Tokenize search inputs and use an OR search by default.

What alternatives have you considered?

I'm not sure that there is an alternative - especially as the number of items increases, I'm much more likely to be searching in a "wait I thought I had this, do I?" mode, where I don't necessarily know the exact string that appears in the item metadata.

Additional context

No response

Contributions

  • I have searched through existing issues and feature requests to see if my idea has already been proposed.
  • If this feature is accepted, I would be willing to help implement and maintain this feature.
  • If this feature is accepted, I'm willing to sponsor the development of this feature.
@lemon1324 lemon1324 added the ⬆️ enhancement New feature or request label Dec 24, 2024
@katosdev
Copy link
Contributor

katosdev commented Jan 4, 2025

Closing to be consolidated into epic : #438

@katosdev katosdev closed this as completed Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⬆️ enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants