Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

travel time and distance by road type #15

Closed
JDWoodcock opened this issue Feb 10, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

travel time and distance by road type #15

JDWoodcock opened this issue Feb 10, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@JDWoodcock
Copy link

implement new approach linking travel time to distance

@syounkin
Copy link
Owner

I think the best approach here is to use the trip simulation method used for ICT. We can estimate the proportional change in person and vehicle distance, by road type, through this simulation, along with travel time, thus linking the two. ICT can serve as a scenario generator that provides ITHIM with mean travel times, person and vehicle miles, by road type and more.

Survey Data -> ICT Trip Class -> ITHIM Class -> Health Outcomes

The ICT class summarizes the baseline and scenario models into parameters that the ITHIM package can use to create two ITHIM objects (baseline and scenario), and perform the physical activity comparative risk analysis and road injury estimation.

@JDWoodcock
Copy link
Author

the ICT is a nice way to generate scenarios but it doesnt solve the road type problem itself (as trip level data wont have road type in it). So we still need some kind intermediary step of estimating % of distance by mode by road type. And for cars I think this is best done by assuming a difference between short and longer distnance car trips. If using aggregated data I would just split short vs long, while using individual level data a more complicated rule could be used (if we have data to support it).
I think there are two reasons not to use individual trip simulation approaches

  1. if people dont have a travel survey to work with
  2. trip switching scenarios are neat but dont allow you to generate all the scenarios that people will be interested in (well not easily anyway)

@syounkin
Copy link
Owner

See issue #23 for continuation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants