Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 16, 2021. It is now read-only.

Dynamic decision whether to show canonical URL or redirect #86

Open
ElectricMaxxx opened this issue Mar 29, 2014 · 6 comments
Open

Dynamic decision whether to show canonical URL or redirect #86

ElectricMaxxx opened this issue Mar 29, 2014 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@ElectricMaxxx
Copy link
Member

to get different pattern for different content or use cases.

One more property for the SeoMetadata and in the Admin-Extension (or the form type) and one more Extractor for that.

@ElectricMaxxx ElectricMaxxx added this to the 1.1 milestone Mar 29, 2014
@dbu dbu changed the title original_url_pattern as user decission or as extractor original_url_pattern as user decision or as extractor Mar 29, 2014
@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented May 8, 2014

if this is still relevant, i fail to understand what exactly the idea is.

@ElectricMaxxx
Copy link
Member Author

I admit, that i have had a bad description. The idea (1.1!):

The pattern for the original-url is a config atm. I just wanted to discuss to chose/ovewrite that pattern either in a select-form for the admin extension or in an extractor. That means a decision for redirect or a canonical link.

@dbu dbu changed the title original_url_pattern as user decision or as extractor Dynamic decision whether to show canonical URL or redirect May 8, 2014
@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented May 8, 2014

okay. i tried to change the title to be more clear. makes sense?

@ElectricMaxxx
Copy link
Member Author

👍

@ElectricMaxxx ElectricMaxxx modified the milestones: 1.2, 1.1 Oct 7, 2014
@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented Jul 28, 2015

still relevant? can we remove the milestone?

@ElectricMaxxx
Copy link
Member Author

ElectricMaxxx commented Jul 28, 2015 via email

@dbu dbu removed this from the 1.2 milestone Jul 28, 2015
@ElectricMaxxx ElectricMaxxx added this to the 2.0 milestone Feb 13, 2016
@ElectricMaxxx ElectricMaxxx modified the milestones: 2.1, 2.0 Nov 28, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants