You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing this great package!
I am trying to visualize with CoveragePlot deferentially accessible peaks between condition A and B in scATACseq data. I used Wilcoxon rank sum test with FindMarkers in Seurat to calculate the DA peaks. Strangely, the DA peak upregulated in condition "A" with the lowest p-value has much lower signal in "A" in the Coverage Plot:
If I plot the counts for this peak, it is clearly more accessible in "A"
Normalized counts:
VlnPlot(seur, features =features.use[i] )
Raw counts:
VlnPlot(seur, features =features.use[i], slot="counts" )
The remaining top 30 up and down DA peaks look more logical on the CoveragePlot. I will be very grateful in any help to understand why is this happening
SessionInfo:
R version 4.4.2 (2024-10-31)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Running under: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
Thank you for developing this great package!
I am trying to visualize with CoveragePlot deferentially accessible peaks between condition A and B in scATACseq data. I used Wilcoxon rank sum test with FindMarkers in Seurat to calculate the DA peaks. Strangely, the DA peak upregulated in condition "A" with the lowest p-value has much lower signal in "A" in the Coverage Plot:
If I plot the counts for this peak, it is clearly more accessible in "A"
Normalized counts:
Raw counts:
The remaining top 30 up and down DA peaks look more logical on the CoveragePlot. I will be very grateful in any help to understand why is this happening
SessionInfo:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: