-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
10X multiome subsetting cancer cell line with blacklist_ratio ~ 1 for both hg38_blacklist and hg38_blacklist_unified #1741
Comments
The |
Hello! Absolutely. Thank you!
|
So I did notice that it is really really close to 1 and if I set the filtering blacklist_ration < 1.015. I still get most of the clusters that I would get without filtering. |
I also used the gencode genome fasta with cellranger-arc genomeGenerate. I had read somewhere that the differences beyond having a "chr" were that UCSC style begins on '1' and Ensembl has no "chr" and begins on '0'. Could that be causing the issue? I have another set with the gencode gtf and ensembl fa. I can check. |
Discussed in #1740
Originally posted by methornton July 9, 2024
Hello! I am processing some cancer cell line 10X plus Mulitome data and I have kind of an outlier as far as the hg38_blacklist_ratio. First, I had to add the metadata from cellranger file 'per_barcode_metrics.csv' file. I used some info from this Q&A site for generating the blacklist_ratio.
I was able to generate the other QC metrics and here are the images.
Any information or advice is greatly appreciated. The nucleosome values are also fairly low. What does that really mean? To me all of the other values look decent. Did I mess up the blacklist ratio calculation?
TIA
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: