Improvement Suggestions #46
daallgeier
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
@mbainter I added this, actually. So would be great to have some improvements here too. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
There has also been a pull request done a couple of days ago to the original one which splits the vendors into a file each. This looks more maintainable. https://github.com/robchahin/sso-wall-of-shame/tree/master/_vendors |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I think keeping to the same structure helps when trying to push a pull
request back to rob.
Same with if we pull from there.
Having a file each will also help with creating new pull requests (from
Issues) as one doesn't have to go into the file, look for the right
position, add the content, and then create the pull request.
…On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 23:55, Mark Bainter ***@***.***> wrote:
I noticed it became active again. I really wish there weren't two
projects, but given that Rob still seems not to want to open it up I don't
think it can be avoided.
I'm not sure how much difference it makes to split it into multiple files
for something like this, but I'm not opposed.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACJRAFL67O54ZDT5VVUUE4TVEXWNTANCNFSM5TILUNWA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
<stopthessotax/sso-wall-of-shame/repo-discussions/46/comments/2555350@
github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We really should add the Contributors.md from the parent repository and maybe a link to something like this to make it easier for submitters.
Originally posted by @mbainter in #43 (comment)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions