Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 4, 2024. It is now read-only.

Support for bridging Ordinals using sBTC #22

Open
andrerserrano opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Support for bridging Ordinals using sBTC #22

andrerserrano opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale

Comments

@andrerserrano
Copy link
Collaborator

Ordinals are driving developer interest in the Bitcoin ecosystem. It's imperative for sBTC to have an Ordinal strategy, given the user demand. Ordinals support was included in the original spec for sBTC Mini here and I wrote a more in depth summary of the opportunity here. Now is the time to revisit this topic to ensure sBTC is capable of supporting Ordinals in the future.

Definition of Done
There is an updated design spec for Ordinal support in the sBTC bridge.

@netrome netrome added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 28, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in Stacks Core Eng Aug 4, 2023
@andrerserrano andrerserrano moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in Stacks Core Eng Aug 9, 2023
@netrome netrome closed this as completed Aug 22, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📋 Backlog to ✅ Done in Stacks Core Eng Aug 22, 2023
@netrome netrome reopened this Aug 22, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from ✅ Done to 🆕 New in Stacks Core Eng Aug 22, 2023
@andrerserrano andrerserrano moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in Stacks Core Eng Sep 11, 2023
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 17, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Mar 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants