Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exiv2 - redqueen behavior #10

Open
CStriker opened this issue Jul 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

exiv2 - redqueen behavior #10

CStriker opened this issue Jul 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@CStriker
Copy link

CStriker commented Jul 6, 2024

Hello,

I'm trying to reproduce the best fuzzer choice for the 'exiv2' binary as described in the autofz paper.

According to the paper, redqueen should produce coverage of around 8000 within one round after fuzzing starts.

I manually overrode the cpu_assign dictionary in the one_round() function and tried two scenarios: running the preparation phase and not running the preparation phase. In both cases, redqueen appears to be almost ineffective for fuzzing 'exiv2' in the early stages.

Is there something else I need to modify to override the fuzzer choice for the focus phase? Or is there an additional condition required to make redqueen work effectively?

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant