-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nesting objects or linking? #5
Comments
I am afraid there is no choice between linking or nesting. The only choice is either nesting or nesting and linking. Why? Structured JsonObjects contain JsonObjects unless they are "flat". We need structured JsonObjects to express company claims properly. So we only have to make the decision if we want to use linking beside nesting or not. I strongly recommend to use linking for objects which exist independently of their parent. Otherwise, uncorrelated objects needs to be created for every relationship. In the information model we are using Aggregation and Composition relationships. That's best practice in the unified modelling world. Aggregation is a HAS-A relationship (linking). The linked object exists independently of the parent. Composition is a PART-OF relationship (nested). The nested object dies with its parent. It doesn't exists independently. classDiagram
class LegalEntity{
<<abstract>>
id
}
class LegalPerson{
<<credentialSubject>>
legalName
legalIdentifier
legalFormType
registeredAddress
contactPoint
registrationDate
legalEntityStatus
legalRepresentative
legalEntityActivity
}
class LegalRepresentative{
<<anonymous>>
legalEntityId
role
scopeOfRepresentation
}
class ContactPoint{
<<anonymous>>
contactPage
hasEmail
hasTelephone
}
class NaturalPerson{
<<credentialSubject>>
familyName
givenName
gender
birthDate
birthPlace
postalAddress
taxDomicile
isAlive
jobTitle
citizenship
domicile
}
class Nace020{
businessCode
businessDescription
}
class Domicile{
postalCode,
addressCountry,
addressLocality
}
LegalPerson "1" *-- "0..1" ContactPoint
LegalPerson "1" *-- "0..1" Nace020
LegalPerson "1" *-- "0..n" LegalRepresentative
LegalRepresentative "0..n" o-- "1" LegalEntity
LegalEntity <|-- NaturalPerson
LegalEntity <|-- LegalPerson
NaturalPerson "1" *-- "1" Domicile
We use Composition (nesting) for any relationship (indicated by filled black diamond) except for the relationship to the NaturalPerson, where we use an Aggregation (linking) relationship (indicated by filled white diamond). The NaturalPerson credential subject exists independently in its own credential and can be reused for different relationships (UBO, Signatory, ShareHolder, ...). We could nest the claims of the person everywhere in the parent, but this would clatter up the parent and not express that it is the same person. It would be just bad practise. Conclusion: Composition (nesting) should be used if the child object doesn't exists independently. Composition results in structured JsonObjects. Aggregation (linking) should be used for objects existing independently of the parent (e.g. a NaturalPerson). Linking is implemented using unique identifiers (e.g. a globally unique credential subject node identifier). |
docs/contexts/eucc/credentials/eu-company-certificate.json
EUCC Schema
In the EUCC we follow the sugested Json schema from Archipels. When stating claims stored in a wallet we follow the Ecdsa 2023 translation.
Nesting or linking
What I saw in the Json Schema and the implementation is the mixed approach to nesting objects and referring to separate objects. We nest objects like Address and link to objects like Person.
Proposal
I propose to do one or the other. In the information model all objects are linked, not nested. In a credential however we have a choice, nesting or linking.
Linking reason 1
So as an information modeler I don't nest, but I link to other entities. This gives more control and avoids repetition (linking to the same address-object it the Registered Office is the same as the Correspondence address).
When modeling
Organization
a link is made toAddress
forregistered office
andcorrespondence address
.When modeling
EUCC
there are obligatory objectscredentialSubject
,credentialStatus
andcredentialSchema
. The credential links to a separate Natural Person Credential. It can, in the same manner, link to other credentials like Address.Linking reason 2
When looking at selective disclosure we need control as well. selective disclosing parts of a nested object is complicated. When the objects are not nested, selective disclosure is realised the same for every credential.
Linking reason 3
Maybe the most important reason, make a choice, or link to objects, or nest objects. Otherwise there should be rules when to nest and when not to nest. The latter will result in strange behaviour in the wallet when presenting credentials especially with selective disclosure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: