Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

define Hets core functionality #2107

Open
tillmo opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

define Hets core functionality #2107

tillmo opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@tillmo
Copy link
Contributor

tillmo commented Sep 21, 2022

Define a list of Hets core functionalities. These should be covered with tests and be provided by an internal API, see #1790. In a next step, interfaces should provide this core functionality (only), and an --experimental flag could be used to have more functionality. There should be two Ubuntu prover packages: one for the core, one for the non-core provers. In this way, Hets will become easier to use and will have fewer bugs.
The core functionality should include:

  • logics CASL, OWL, Common Logic, TPTP
  • suitable comorphisms for these
  • suitable provers: Vampire, Eprover, SPASS, Pellet, Fact, Leo-II, Satallax, Zipperposition
  • suitable consistency checkers: Darwin, Vampire
  • output logics, comorphisms, provers
  • the DOL language
  • Parsing, printing, static analysis of documents, computation of a library env with development graphs
  • output library env as XML
  • auto command for a development graph (shifts proof obligations from edges to nodes)
  • select a node from a DG (if there is a unique node of a unique DG, it will be preselected)
  • for the current (or an explicitly specified) node:
    • output node type
    • output signature
    • output theory and proof obligations
    • output logic and sublogic
    • translate theory along comorphism
    • select prover and axioms to use
    • select consistency checker
    • set time limit
    • prove, output proof
    • check consistency, output model
  • for an edge in the DG, display edge type, comorphism (if not identity) and signature morphism
@mcodescu
Copy link
Collaborator

I like this idea very much. I just wonder if we currently support Common Logic enough to include it as a core logic. We should at least make sure that the Common Logic issues that are currently open aren't critical.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants