conclusion.qmd

# Conclusion

We set out to define what makes a day "nice" in the context of it being too nice out to take a cab. 
In doing so, we worked off of the assumption that there *is* a relationship 
between the weather and taxi or Uber/Lyft usage, i.e. 
that people change their routines according to the weather. 
However, trying to assess exactly "when" and "how" these changes occur proved to be very challenging. 

To start, we used the most recent five years of weather and taxi data available for NYC. 
This meant that we ran into the fated Pandemic Issue, 
causing us to toss out half of our data. 
Our transportation habits did not bounce back after restrictions were lifted; 
instead our behavior is fundamentally different. 
Working with a reduced dataset, we pushed foward. 
Still, we found it hard to establish a "normal" taxi day or hour 
against which we could compare because the weather is seasonal,
and taxi usage is hebdomadal. 
To account for the latter effect, we narrowed our scope to rush hour times. 
This reduced some variability and was somewhat promising, 
but the effects we noticed were faint. 
Future work would test the effects against a null hypothesis.

Despite these limitations, we still tried to analyze trends broad trends in weather and taxi usage, 
but the results were confusing. 
One of the stronger conclusions we were able to make was that if there is a relationship to taxi use and temperature, 
it is not linear. 
There seems to be a sweet spot at around 20°, 
when it is nice enough to walk instead of ride for a short trip, 
but not so hot to be annoying. 
Also, we saw that more extreme demand times were more likely on rainy days than non-rainy ones. 
We also learned that rain and cloud cover have small effects on short trip likelihood.

Were we to continue, there would be several areas of improvement to address. 
One in particular is to account for the interdependence of weather variables. 
Modeling this data instead of relying purely on EDA would help understand this issue better. 
Further, we'd recommend re-binning trip distances to account for the number of trips 
between one and two miles—our loose grouping may have obscured some trends. 
And, finally, having a full-five year dataset would be incredibly helpful. 
Or, conceivably, we could imagine a way to control for the Pandemic.