-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix type forward declaration in the bindings #457
Open
damienmarchal
wants to merge
8
commits into
sofa-framework:master
Choose a base branch
from
CRIStAL-PADR:pr-typehint-example-how-to-fix-definition
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Fix type forward declaration in the bindings #457
damienmarchal
wants to merge
8
commits into
sofa-framework:master
from
CRIStAL-PADR:pr-typehint-example-how-to-fix-definition
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nows about them. The problem: Depending on the definition order of the binded classes, there may have incorrect types if Base is useing BaseData... but BaseData is only binded after Base. The PR propose a solution for that using a decidcated "forward" registration patter.
damienmarchal
added
pr: status to review
pr: experimental
pr: clean-fix
and removed
pr: experimental
labels
Sep 23, 2024
hugtalbot
changed the title
Example on how fix type forward declaration in the binding.
Example on how fix type forward declaration in the binding
Oct 2, 2024
…-how-to-fix-definition
…definition' into pr-typehint-example-how-to-fix-definition
It should be completed if ones want more feature than just class declaration
…-how-to-fix-definition
Rebased and passing tests. |
Merged
PR looks clean 👍 but I would need some insight (the link with #456) |
…-how-to-fix-definition
In #456 was a preliminary version of the current one on BaseData. The current PR covers the whole plugin. So to me it is to merge if CI pass. |
damienmarchal
changed the title
Example on how fix type forward declaration in the binding
Fix type forward declaration in the bindings
Dec 6, 2024
bakpaul
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2024
alxbilger
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem:
Depending on the definition order of the binded classes, binding "Base", and BaseData registered after then the use of BaseData in the function signature in Base will have invalid string name. This prevent stubgen to make their work.
In the PR I propose a way to fix that.