You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Actually, it seems that the difference in the above between classification and other tasks does not occur in your EfficientFormer code.
I tried my best to find the detail in both your code and paper, but I couldn't.
So, I kindly ask you if you could explain why this should be different.
Thank you in advance.
+)
To clarify my question, I added the corresponding code lines from EfficientFormer used in segmentation:
Hi,
First of all, congrats for this awesome research 🎉
I have a simple question while reading your EfficientFormerV2 codes.
In your
backbone
codes for detection and segmentation, I found thatnorm_layer
s are not applied inforward_token
:EfficientFormer/segmentation/backbonev2.py
Lines 650 to 653 in 2c0e950
However, for your backbone in classifcation, it forwards with the
norm_layer
:EfficientFormer/models/efficientformer_v2.py
Lines 622 to 625 in 2c0e950
Actually, it seems that the difference in the above between classification and other tasks does not occur in your EfficientFormer code.
I tried my best to find the detail in both your code and paper, but I couldn't.
So, I kindly ask you if you could explain why this should be different.
Thank you in advance.
+)
To clarify my question, I added the corresponding code lines from EfficientFormer used in segmentation:
EfficientFormer/segmentation/backbone.py
Lines 478 to 483 in 2c0e950
Those seems to be the outputs from each norm layer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: