-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
presentation-mark.txt
74 lines (66 loc) · 2.23 KB
/
presentation-mark.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
Final Project Presentation Marking Rubric
=========================================
Team Name: ToDo
Part I - Live Presentation - 30 marks
-------------------------------------
Product Demo[10 marks]:
-Product introduction: 0-1 marks [1=Product introduced, 0=No introduction]
==========
Your mark: 0.5
==========
-Features Demo: up to 3 marks for each major feature presented
-Feature 1 presentation: Zone
0-3 marks [3=Excellent, 2=Adequate, 1=Inadequate, 0=No feature]
==========
Your mark: 3
==========
-Feature 2 presentation: Picks
0-3 marks [3=Excellent, 2=Adequate, 1=Inadequate, 0=No feature]
After evaluation, text colour changed to black (hard to see).
==========
Your mark: 2.8
==========
-Feature 3 presentation: Trivia
0-3 marks [3=Excellent, 2=Adequate, 1=Inadequate, 0=No feature]
==========
Your mark: 3
==========
Process[10 marks]:
-Team Introduction:
0-4 marks
[4=Presentation looks and sounds professional, all members are present]
[Each missing person, minus 1 mark]
[Note due to this year's special situation: you may or may not show your person in video. However voice participation is a mandatory minimum]
==========
Your mark: 4
==========
-Team communication, processes, standards, and techniques:
0-6 marks
[Each element 2 marks if presented professionally, 1 mark if presented adequately, 0 otherwise]
==========
Your mark: 6
==========
Software Architecture[10 marks]:
-0-4 marks
[4=Architecture presented clearly, illustrated with sufficient diagrams, components and responsibilities shown clearly]
[-1 mark for each missing component]
==========
Your mark: 4
==========
Technologies used and technical challenges
-0-6 marks
[6=Technologies presented clearly, illustrated with sufficient diagrams/links/examples, technical challenges indicated clearly
Also a clear description what the team did to overcome those challenges]
[-2 marks for each missing component, -1 mark is component not presented clearly]
==========
Your mark: 6
==========
Participation[5 marks]
-Team asked at least two meaningful questions to other teams
-Q1 (2 marks)
-Q2 (2 marks)
-Questions were asked using a professional tone and body language (1 mark)
==========
Your mark: 5
==========
Total: 34.3/35