New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

relational algebra in JuMP #3

Open

slwu89 opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 2 comments

Owner

slwu89 commented Dec 1, 2023

See jump-dev/JuMP.jl#3438, specifically https://jump.dev/JuMP.jl/stable/tutorials/linear/multi_commodity_network/ is mentioned. It'd be good to get an acsets implementation.

Owner Author

slwu89 commented Dec 2, 2023

See the other issue here jump-dev/JuMP.jl#3212 and the linked paper https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167923697000079?via%3Dihub

Want to look for examples where a single dataframe cannot accomplish the required task, and where acsets can really shine.

Owner Author

slwu89 commented Mar 27, 2024

Also This question https://discourse.julialang.org/t/speeding-up-jump-model-creation-with-sets-that-depend-on-other-indexes/107333 which evolved into a discussion on how to improve DataFrames performance https://discourse.julialang.org/t/help-improving-the-speed-of-a-dataframes-operation/107615

slwu89 transferred this issue from slwu89/optimex

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment