-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SITMUN Base layer concept not being itself #57
Labels
question
Further information is requested
Comments
I think that this is a "feature" of API SITNA. @silmeUsil0001 , can you confirm this? |
This issue implies a reevaluation of the background concept in SITMUN... we should discuss it. |
ScenariosIf we maintain the background concept in SITMUN as a set of multiple layers, there are three main scenarios to consider:
Review
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug
In SITMUN 2 a base map can be made up of one or more layers. In SITMUN 3, if a background map is configured with several layers, the viewer interprets it as different background maps instead of joining the different layers that form it into a single one.
Let us explain it with an example: If we want to define a background map formed by a WMTS orthophoto layer and a toponym layer on top of it, this can be done in SITMUN 2 but not in SITMUN 3. The SITMUN 3 viewer will interpret each layer (the ortophoto and the toponym) defined as part of the same a background map as a separate background map.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Every 'Capa de fons' (background map) defined and assigned to a SITMUN aplication is listed in the 'Capes de fons' Div in the SITMUN viewer.
If a background map is made up of multiple layers, the viewer displays a single background map which will be the sum of the different layers.
IMPORTANT: The name displayed in the viewer for a 'Mapa de Fons' has to be the one configured in the Mapes de fons form, not the name of the layers.
Screenshots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: