You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have changed some of the code to use Table, which wraps DataFrame. It has the field potential. Should tables be interpreted solely as representations of potentials (in this case probability distributions)? Or should we have one Table type that holds all kinds of tables, e.g., samples, counts, weighted samples, conditional probability tables, etc.? And, if so, should we rename potential to something else (perhaps, df)?
I'd especially like to know what @tawheeler and @hamzaelsaawy think. Let me know and I'll implement it over the next few days.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have changed some of the code to use
Table
, which wrapsDataFrame
. It has the fieldpotential
. Should tables be interpreted solely as representations of potentials (in this case probability distributions)? Or should we have oneTable
type that holds all kinds of tables, e.g., samples, counts, weighted samples, conditional probability tables, etc.? And, if so, should we renamepotential
to something else (perhaps,df
)?I'd especially like to know what @tawheeler and @hamzaelsaawy think. Let me know and I'll implement it over the next few days.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: