You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello nice library, i think i prefer the aesthetics to ts-pattern. I noticed that ts-pattern was benchmarked to have a pretty huge overhead, between 10x to 1000x. gvergnaud/ts-pattern#173
Have you don't any benchmarks on match-iz for a comparison?
Thanks for the library
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey, thanks for checking out the library. I don't have any comparison benchmarks, but I could potentially look into the ones you linked and adapt them.
It's going to be a busy month for me, so I would welcome any assistance. Otherwise, I should have time to look into this in September.
With any tool like this there is a runtime cost, but if it's any indicator of performance, I've written an eslint plug-in using match-iz to help with AST parsing, and another library "viddy" uses it heavily.
There's a big difference in performance demand between these two though.
Hello nice library, i think i prefer the aesthetics to ts-pattern. I noticed that ts-pattern was benchmarked to have a pretty huge overhead, between 10x to 1000x. gvergnaud/ts-pattern#173
Have you don't any benchmarks on match-iz for a comparison?
Thanks for the library
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: