Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing Solution and Test Cases for CountDistinctSlices and EquiLeader #3

Open
shortthirdman opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4
Open

Missing Solution and Test Cases for CountDistinctSlices and EquiLeader #3

shortthirdman opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@shortthirdman
Copy link
Owner

Created two classes, CountDistinctSlices and EquiLeader, as part of ongoing work to solve specific problem statements. However, their solutions are not yet implemented or corresponding test cases using JUnit 5 have been added.

Tasks:

  1. Implement solutions
  • CountDistinctSlices: Create a method to solve the problem statement related to counting distinct slices.
  • EquiLeader: Develop a method to determine the leader of the array.
  1. Add JUnit 5 Test Cases
    Write comprehensive unit tests for both classes to ensure that the solutions work correctly under various scenarios.

Expected Outcome:
Having the solutions implemented along with JUnit 5 test cases will enhance the functionality of our project and ensure code reliability.

@shortthirdman shortthirdman added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Sep 22, 2024
@shortthirdman shortthirdman self-assigned this Sep 22, 2024
@shortthirdman shortthirdman linked a pull request Oct 8, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant