You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 29, 2023. It is now read-only.
After reading your paper, I'm confused about the IDSW score of DAN's. In the table 6, we can find that the IDSW of DAN is 8431, that is the largest one among all offline and online methods.
I understand the main contribution of DAN is to improve the tracking association results by using deep learning technique, in that case, can't we get lower IDSW number due to good association results?
I'm not sure whether I missed something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi, thanks for your great work in MOT field.
After reading your paper, I'm confused about the
IDSW
score of DAN's. In thetable 6
, we can find that the IDSW of DAN is8431
, that is the largest one among all offline and online methods.I understand the main contribution of DAN is to improve the tracking association results by using deep learning technique, in that case, can't we get lower IDSW number due to good association results?
I'm not sure whether I missed something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: