Thanks for your interest in this project.
In domains like automotive, robotics or gaming, a huge amount of data must be transferred between different parts of the system. If these parts are actually different processes on a POSIX based operating system like Linux, this huge amount of data has to be transferred via an inter-process-communication (IPC) mechanism. Find more infos on the Eclipse site.
Before your contribution can be accepted by the project team, contributors must electronically sign the Eclipse Contributor Agreement (ECA).
Commits that are provided by non-committers must have a Signed-off-by field in the footer indicating that the author is aware of the terms by which the contribution has been provided to the project. The non-committer must additionally have an Eclipse Foundation account and must have a signed Eclipse Contributor Agreement (ECA) on file.
For more information, please see the Eclipse Committer Handbook.
Contact the project developers via the project's "dev" list.
We love pull requests! The next sections try to cover most of the relevant questions. For larger contributions or architectural changes, we'd kindly ask you to either:
- Raise the proposed changes during a developer meetup
or
- Create a design document and raise it in a separate pull request beforehand
If you would like to report a bug or propose a new feature, please raise an issue before raising a pull request. Please have a quick search upfront if a similar issue already exists. An release board is used to prioritize the issues for a specific release. This makes it easier to track the work-in-progress. If you have troubles getting an issue assigned to you please contact the maintainers via Gitter.
Please make sure you have:
- Signed the Eclipse Contributor Agreement
- Created an issue before creating a branch, e.g.
Super duper feature
with issue number123
- All branches have the following naming format:
iox-#[issue]-branch-name
e.g.iox-#123-super-duper-feature
- All commits have the following naming format:
iox-#[issue] commit message
e.g.iox-#123 implemented super-duper feature
- All commits have been signed with
git commit -s
- You open your pull request towards the base branch
staging
- Link the pull request to the according Github issue and set the label accordingly
We love the C++ core guidelines. If in doubt please try to follow them as well as our unwritten conventions in the existing parts of the code base. Please format your code with the provided clang-format and clang-tidy before raising a pull request. Lots of IDEs do read the clang-format file these days.
We created some convenient rules to highlight some bits that you might not be used to in other FOSS projects. They are helpful to build embedded systems for safety fields like automotive or avionics. It is possible that not the whole codebase follows these rules, things are work in progress.
- No heap is allowed, static memory management hugely decreases the complexity of your software (e.g. cxx::vector without heap)
- No exception are allowed, all function and methods need to have
noexcept
in their signature - No undefined behavior, zero-cost abstract is not feasible in high safety environments
- Use C++14
- Rule of Five, if there is a non-default destructor needed, the rule of five has to be applied
- STL, we aim to be compatible towards the STL, but
our code may contain additions which are not compatible with the STL (e.g.
iox::cxx::vector::emplace_back()
does return a bool) - Always use
iox::log::Logger
, instead ofprintf()
- Always use
iox::ErrorHandler()
, instead of the direct STL calls
See error-handling.md for additional information about logging and error handling.
- File names with
lower_snake_case
:my_thing.hpp
- Structs, classes and enum classes in
UpperCamelCase
:class MyClass{}
- Methods and variables in
lowerCamelCase
:uint16_t myVariable
- Compile time constants, also enum values in
UPPER_SNAKE_CASE
:static constexpr uint16_t MY_CONSTANT
- Class members start with
m_
:m_myMember
- Public members of structs and classes do not have the
m_
prefix
- Public members of structs and classes do not have the
- Namespaces in
lower_snake_case
:my_namespace
- Aliases have a
_t
postfix :using FooString_t = iox::cxx::string<100>;
Please use doxygen to document your code.
The following doxygen comments are required for public API headers:
/// @brief short description
/// @param[in] / [out] / [in,out] name description
/// @return description
A good example for code formatting and doxygen structure is at swe_docu_guidelines.md (WIP)
The folder structure boils down to:
- iceoryx_COMPONENT
- cmake: All cmakes files go here, needed for
find_pkg()
- doc: Manuals and documentation
- include: public headers with stable API
- internal: public headers with unstable API, which might change quite frequently
- source: implementation files
- test: unit and integration tests
- CMakeLists.txt: Build the component separately
- cmake: All cmakes files go here, needed for
- examples_iceoryx: Examples described in iceoryx_examples
All new code should follow the folder structure.
We use Google test for our unit and integration tests. We require compatibility with the version 1.8.1.
Unit tests are black box tests that test the public interface of a class. They are required for all new code.
Integration tests are composition of more than one class and test their interaction. They are optional for new code.
To ensure that the provided testcode covers the productive code you can do a coverage scan with gcov. The reporting is done with lcov and htmlgen. You will need to install the following packages:
sudo apt install lcov
In iceoryx we have multiple testlevels for testcoverage: 'unit', 'integration', 'component' and ’all’ for all testlevels together. You can create reports for these different testlevels or for all tests. Coverage is done with gcc. The coverage scan applies to Quality level 3 and partly level 2 with branch coverage.
For having a coverage report iceoryx needs to be compiled with coverage flags and the tests needs to be executed. You can do this with one command in iceroyx folder like this:
./tools/iceoryx_build_test.sh clean build-all -c <testlevel>
Optionally you can use build-all option to get coverage for extensions like DDS or C-Binding. The -c flag indicates that you want to have a coverage report and you can pass there the needed testlevel. Per default the testlevel is set to 'all'. example:
./tools/iceoryx_build_test.sh build-all clean -c unit
For having only reports for unit-test. In the script tools/gcov/lcov_generate.sh is the initial scan, filtering and report generation automatically done.
All reports are stored in build/lcov as html report (index.html).
-
POSIX Iceoryx aims to be fully POSIX-compliant towards the current revision POSIX.1-2017 (IEEE 1003.1-2017). Please write your code as portable as possible. Currently our focus is QNX (QCC 5.4) and Linux (GCC 7.5.0).
We aim for ASIL-D compliance. The ISO26262 is also a good read-up if you want to learn more about automotive safety. A nice introduction video was presented on CppCon 2019.
If you want to report a vulnerability, please use the Eclipse process.
We have a partnership with Perforce and use Helix QAC++ 2019.2 to perform a static-code analysis.
Github labels are used to group issues into the rulesets:
Ruleset name | Github issue label |
---|---|
MISRA C++ 2008 | MISRA |
Adaptive AUTOSAR C++14 | AUTOSAR |
SEI CERT C++ 2016 Coding Standard | CERT |
If one of the rules is not followed, a rationale is added in the following manner:
With a comment in the same line:
*mynullptr = foo; // PRQA S 4242 # Short description why
With a comment one line above (with the number after the warning number, next ’n’ lines are inclusive)
// PRQA S 4242 1 # Short description why
*mynullptr = foo;
Don't be afraid if you don't have Helix QAC++ available. As we want to make it easy for developers to contribute,
please use the staging
branch and we'll run the QAC++ scan and get back to you.
Results will be available on this Helix QAC dashboard. Please contact one of the maintainers, if you're interested in getting access.
It is possible that not the whole codebase follows these rules, things are work in progress. But this is where we want go. As of now we don't have any continuos integration checks implemented but will rely on reviews during the pull requests. We're planning to introduce continuos integration checks in the near future.
Each source file needs to have this header:
// Copyright (c) [DATE] by [INITIAL COPYRIGHT OWNER] [OTHER COPYRIGHT OWNERS]. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
Note: DATE
is either a year or a range of years with the first and last years of the range separated by a comma. So for example: "2004" or "2000, 2004". The first year is when the contents of the file were first created and the last year is when the contents were last modified.
Example:
// Copyright (c) 2018, 2020 by ACME Corp, Globex. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
CMake targets can be developed according to different quality levels. Despite developing some of our targets according to automotive standards like ISO26262, the code base standalone does NOT legitimize the usage in a safety critical system. All requirements of a lower quality level are included in higher quality levels e.g. quality level 4 is included in quality level 3.
Also see ROS quality levels.
This quality level is the default quality level. It is meant for examples and helper tools.
- Reviewed by two approver
- License and copyright statement available
- No version policy required
- No unit tests required
This quality level is meant for all targets that need tier 1 support in ROS2.
- Basic unit tests are available
- No compiler warnings
- Doxygen and documentation available
- Test specification available
- Version policy required
- Level 8 and 9 warnings in Helix QAC addressed
- Unit tests have full statement and branch coverage
- Warnings in Helix QAC addressed
- Code coverage according to MC/DC available
- Effective C++ by Scott Meyers
- Unit Testing and the Arrange, Act and Assert (AAA) Pattern by Paulo Gomes
- The C++ Standard Library by Nicolai M. Josuttis
- Modern C++ Programming with Test-Driven Development: Code Better, Sleep Better by Jeff Langr
- Modern C++ Design: Generic Programming and Design Patterns by Andrei Alexandrescu
- Exceptional C++ by Herb Sutter
- C++ Concurrency in Action by Anthony Williams