Incorrect graphical output for some sedml tests

[shalinshah1993]

The tests that do not give correct answers:

• osci-nested-pulse
• repeated-scan-osci
• repeated-steady-scan
• repeated-stochastic-scan
• param-scan-2D

The graphical outputs are exactly the same for all the repeated tasks i.e. the individual iterations don't apply changes from the listOfChanges sedml element.

[shalinshah1993]

The source of this bug is jlibsedml's ModelResolver class. As per description, SEDMLDocument.getModelString should apply all the list of changes to the model ( including repeatedTasks compute changes) but no changes are applied.

This is because jlibsedml's computeChange function only supports changing:

- CHANGE_ATTRIBUTE_KIND 
- REMOVE_XML_KIND
- ADD_XML_KIND
- NO_NAMESPACE
- CHANGE_XML_KIND

However, as per their documentation of Change class, there can be following categories of changes.

- SEDMLTags.CHANGE_ATTRIBUTE_KIND
- SEDMLTags.CHANGE_XML_KIND
- SEDMLTags.ADD_XML_KIND
- SEDMLTags.REMOVE_XML_KIND
- SEDMLTags.COMPUTE_CHANGE_KIND (missing in their implementation, required to comute model changes for each iteration of repeated tasks)
- SET_VALUE_KIND

@matthiaskoenig @draeger do you guys know who is working on jlibsedml who can respond to this issue?

I see Richard Adams maintains jlibsedml and he also wrote code for SBSCL in the past. Can you connect me with him?

[draeger]

I don't currently have any contact to @otter606 and am not aware of the current state of jlibsedml.

[otter606]

Hi I got the notification but have not worked on jlibsedml for years, I think Frank Bergmann was maintaining itm, but this was some years ago. Richard

…

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Andreas Dräger ***@***.***> wrote: I don't currently have any contact to @otter606 <https://github.com/otter606> and am not aware of the current state of jlibsedml. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJA6nYKBDgC7AwVDNkBGRyY3l-aOJ4mQks5uJt8WgaJpZM4VbK9Z> .

[draeger]

Maybe @fbergmann can give more information?

[fbergmann]

I am not actively using jlibsedml. I'd be happy to propagate any code changes to the repository, or add another developer to the list. Chris Meyers was the last to commit to the project.

[draeger]

@cjmyers: what is the current state of jlibsedml?

[cjmyers]

Stalled. There is no one currently actively developing it. It would be great to have someone come along and champion it.

…

On Jul 25, 2018, at 5:25 AM, Andreas Dräger ***@***.***> wrote: @cjmyers <https://github.com/cjmyers>: what is the current state of jlibsedml? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWD96U4wRYwWzCFhBQ5ohmBNR-8ASjZks5uKGO5gaJpZM4VbK9Z>.

[shalinshah1993]

Since no one actively managing jlibsedml, I just added my own code for working with SEDMLTags.COMPUTE_CHANGE_KIND. Currently, the code uses string processing functions to extract SBML parameter from XPath and it updates them if SetValue element specifies a range for the parameter.

After pushing b64b096

The test cases that don't work:

• osci-nested-pulse (because functional range MathML evaluation not supported by jlibsedml yet)
• repeated-stochastic-scan (same as first)
• param-scan-2D (because SBSCL doesn't support repeated task)

Two test cases that are giving unstable results:

• repeated-steady-scan-oscli
• repeated-stochastic-runs

Their outputs are as under. My guess why we get different results is because of the use of different simulation algorithm. We use Rosenbrock solver instead of what the SED-ML files ask.

[shalinshah1993]

@cjmyers Do you have a Github repo that i can send pull request to?

…

On Jul 25, 2018, at 11:30 AM, cjmyers ***@***.***> wrote: Stalled. There is no one currently actively developing it. It would be great to have someone come along and champion it. > On Jul 25, 2018, at 5:25 AM, Andreas Dräger ***@***.***> wrote: > > @cjmyers <https://github.com/cjmyers>: what is the current state of jlibsedml? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWD96U4wRYwWzCFhBQ5ohmBNR-8ASjZks5uKGO5gaJpZM4VbK9Z>. > — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[fbergmann]

so far sources are kept in sf svn ... but if you send me a patch i will apply it happily

[shalinshah1993]

This depends on #55

[shalinshah1993]

This issue was moved to draeger-lab#7