Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

org.I0Itec vs com.101tec #80

Open
zenglian opened this issue May 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

org.I0Itec vs com.101tec #80

zenglian opened this issue May 20, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@zenglian
Copy link

zenglian commented May 20, 2019

There are some problems with the package name:
(1) The package name is inconsistent with the artifiact/domain name.
(2) According to Java's naming convention, package name should be in lower case.
(3) I pretends to be 1 seems not to be a good idea...

I understand 101tec is not a valid package name in java. IMO, even l0ltec is better than I0Itec, and com.I0Itec is better than org.I0Itec. But if I were you, I would considering another domain name (not starting with number).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant