Better coverage for linting #148
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'm closing this one as it this point it seems like merging with main is more problematic than doing from scratch. I will open another PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make sure that
ruff's linter covers the following files:__init__.py(all of them)base.py(all of them)utils.py(all of them)conftest.pyI left 2 rules excluded for
skada/base.py(D101 and D102), it will take quite some work for fix all the documentation.@tgnassou There's a question for you. In
skada/deep/base.pyI tried to wrote proper documentation for theforwardfunction (see files changed). There's a single "???" in there, as I'm not really sure how to explain all 3 branches in the code. Would you please help me with that?Closes #136.