From a9be4da228294845b2a25b924df35346f7d2f607 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mgh Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:02:51 +0330 Subject: [PATCH] docs(readme): update link of ocov journal paper --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 68e0649..d31ee99 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ in summary: * **Object coverage**: This method measures the percentage of code that is executed by the exact type of object (actual type of object should be the same as the class under test) and also the inherited code of the class should be coveraged by tests to achinve high object coverage. for more academic information about these new criteria and how are effective refer to this academic paper: -[M. Ghoreshi, and H. Haghighi. "Object coverage criteria for supporting object-oriented testing." Software Quality Journal (2023)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11219-023-09643-3). +* [M. Ghoreshi, and H. Haghighi. "Object coverage criteria for supporting object-oriented testing." Software Quality Journal (2023)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11219-023-09643-3). ## Simple examples that make sence! ### Why does the actual type of the object matter?