You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue: XML Schema comparison according to Openconfig models. #125
As a:
Currently, we don't have a tool to compare any OC standards models with the vendor implementation.
Each network equipment has yang files charged in a folder, each yang files corresponding with the vendor implementation of OC models.
For example, there is an OC model (openconfig-routing-policy.yang) and the vendor implementation is (oc-routing-policy.yang).
At this moment we must review manually the correct standard compliance (paths of the parameters, parameters mandatories, value types) and compare with the corresponding OC model.
And determine the implementation deviation percentage of each vendor with their details and knows which one's parameters it does not support.
I want:
A tool that compares the OC Models standard with the implementation vendors OC, introducing both model's paths and generate an excel report with the below information:
Deviation percentage according to differences like a (paths of parameters, parameters mandatories, and value types).
List of differences (path of parameters, parameters mandatories, and value types.) showing which one is the correct path and the incorrect path, correct parameters mandatories and incorrect parameters mandatories, correct value types, and incorrect value types.
Which parameters are missing in the OC model implementation of the vendor.
This must compare with the standard OC models.
So that:
It will permit, that we will know the real support percentage of vendors per model and determine which parameters are supported or has any deviation to make the XML and YML according to this information. Other benefits without a doubt are the time that we must spend looking for parameter deviations.
Accept Criteria:
Testing tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Date: 02/10/2020
Username: Daniel Hernández
Issue: XML Schema comparison according to Openconfig models. #125
As a:
Currently, we don't have a tool to compare any OC standards models with the vendor implementation.
Each network equipment has yang files charged in a folder, each yang files corresponding with the vendor implementation of OC models.
For example, there is an OC model (openconfig-routing-policy.yang) and the vendor implementation is (oc-routing-policy.yang).
At this moment we must review manually the correct standard compliance (paths of the parameters, parameters mandatories, value types) and compare with the corresponding OC model.
And determine the implementation deviation percentage of each vendor with their details and knows which one's parameters it does not support.
I want:
A tool that compares the OC Models standard with the implementation vendors OC, introducing both model's paths and generate an excel report with the below information:
Deviation percentage according to differences like a (paths of parameters, parameters mandatories, and value types).
List of differences (path of parameters, parameters mandatories, and value types.) showing which one is the correct path and the incorrect path, correct parameters mandatories and incorrect parameters mandatories, correct value types, and incorrect value types.
Which parameters are missing in the OC model implementation of the vendor.
This must compare with the standard OC models.
So that:
It will permit, that we will know the real support percentage of vendors per model and determine which parameters are supported or has any deviation to make the XML and YML according to this information. Other benefits without a doubt are the time that we must spend looking for parameter deviations.
Accept Criteria:
Testing tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: