We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The check here is not sufficiently robust:
https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-compute-docker/blob/main/src/cloud-filesystem/scripts/cloud_filesystem.py#L839
I saw an example of a cloud filesystem where we had only this:
/buckets/storage-bucket-25/juicefs$ ls juicefs_uuid
It thus wouldn't format it. However, it wasn't formatted. So I think we need a better test:
We should be able to check this though using juicefs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the case where I saw this I removed /buckets/storage-bucket-25/juicefs and then it worked to format.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The check here is not sufficiently robust:
https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-compute-docker/blob/main/src/cloud-filesystem/scripts/cloud_filesystem.py#L839
I saw an example of a cloud filesystem where we had only this:
It thus wouldn't format it. However, it wasn't formatted. So I think we need a better test:
We should be able to check this though using juicefs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: