Propose to remove Target Endpoint Classification Task

[adammontville]

We have already talked about "Endpoint Classification Task" and "Target Endpoint" is it really necessary to define the combination of the two?

[henkbirkholz]

Actually, this is done correctly. It is not named "Endpoint Classification Task" anywhere, but "Target Endpoint Classification Task".

[adammontville]

Now I am somewhat confused. See the comment chains for #75 and #74, which are all complaints of the same form. We have defined A and B do we really need to define A + B? In one case, the recommendation was to adjust the definition and relabel (see #74), and in another case the recommendation was to retain the term, as is, in favor of moving it to an appropriate draft down the road.

This term, Target Endpoint Classification Task, seems like it should fall in the latter category, yes?