Propose to remove Supplicant

[adammontville]

Supplicant seems like a commonly understood term, should we really define it in SACM terms here?

[henkbirkholz]

This issue has dependencies to the definition of the registration task, which is... underspecified at the moment, I think.

[adammontville]

I think what you're saying is that the term SACM Component Registration, which has yet to be defined, will likely rely on the term supplicant. :-) My question still stands: Do we really need to define supplicant?

[henkbirkholz]

No one can answer this question before an update of the architecture, I think. It might be better not to refactor that part of the terminology too much right now, if it might be altered again when working on the architecture?