We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Maybe it's just a matter of definition, but an element starting exactly at the invisible first pixel under viewport is considered "inViewport". Why?
http://plnkr.co/edit/rurMeic3TAIEXQ8OHJLz?p=preview
Considering that position counting starts at 0, an element having top=viewportH() isn't really in the viewport IMO.
top=viewportH()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm reasonable logic. The current logic is inclusive of both endpoints.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Maybe it's just a matter of definition, but an element starting exactly at the invisible first pixel under viewport is considered "inViewport". Why?
http://plnkr.co/edit/rurMeic3TAIEXQ8OHJLz?p=preview
Considering that position counting starts at 0, an element having
top=viewportH()
isn't really in the viewport IMO.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: