-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kinematic chains with passive joints don't work with position interface #240
Comments
I'm not sure how gazebo with gz_ros2_control behaves with passive joints. But one suggestion for gazebo_ros2_control would be to implement a high-gain feedback on the effort or velocity interface from position commands, similar to the position interface of gz_ros2_control But I'm not certain if this will end up in a stable simulation. |
christophfroehlich
changed the title
Passive joints don't work with position or velocity interface
Kinematic chain with passive joints don't work with position or velocity interface
Oct 16, 2023
christophfroehlich
changed the title
Kinematic chain with passive joints don't work with position or velocity interface
Kinematic chain with passive joints don't work with position interface
Nov 13, 2023
3 tasks
christophfroehlich
changed the title
Kinematic chain with passive joints don't work with position interface
Kinematic chains with passive joints don't work with position interface
Apr 11, 2024
This was referenced May 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As indicated with #172, passive joints not being part of a kinematic chain (a pendulum for example) do not work properly if anything except effort interface is used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: