We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Given the license and source code have remained stable since 2013, would it be acceptable to have the license submitted for inclusion on the SPDX list (see. https://spdx.org/licenses/) per the guidelines (see. https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/master/DOCS/license-inclusion-principles.md)?
The aim would be to aid in compliance with your terms (particularly the non-commercial requirement) through detection in SBOM generation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am not the original author of VQMT and didn't pick the license. I would suggest contacting EPFL and/or the original author about such request.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Given the license and source code have remained stable since 2013, would it be acceptable to have the license submitted for inclusion on the SPDX list (see. https://spdx.org/licenses/) per the guidelines (see. https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/master/DOCS/license-inclusion-principles.md)?
The aim would be to aid in compliance with your terms (particularly the non-commercial requirement) through detection in SBOM generation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: